🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam order, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to use a redrawn congressional map that could add as many as five new GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 decision, handed down on Thursday, upholds a appeal by the state to lift a lower court's ruling that had rejected the new map in November.

Court's Reasoning

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing much confusion and upsetting the fine federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in explaining its decision.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably sorted voters by their race – a method known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to employ the districts established after the 2020 census for the upcoming election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

Through a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the majority's ruling. She contended that it disregarded the work of the lower court, observing that its opinion was actually authored by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling ensures that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, without justification, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

National Redistricting Fight

The court's action is part of a countrywide battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican majority. Usually, boundary revision takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that could add a number of more Republican-leaning seats. The opposition, for their part, have countered with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas attorney general welcomed the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures representation aligned with the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

On the other hand, Democratic representatives lamented the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major party election organization.

A senior Democratic figure said the court had another time shredded its legitimacy by approving a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.