🔗 Share this article

When the nation marked its 200th anniversary on July 4, 1976, the milestone was marked by the opening of the National Air and Space Museum's exhibition hall on Washington DC's iconic Mall. Designed in a boldly modernist style, it served as a testament to American aviation achievements, spanning from the Wright brothers to the moon landings.

At that time, despite the lingering shadow of political shenanigans, there was a widespread feeling of a nation looking toward progress and scientific advancement. Historical re-enactments were present, yet the dominant narrative was firmly on the horizon and modernity.

“The one that people know mostly is the Arc de Triomphe in Paris, France. And we’re gonna top it by, I think, a lot.”

Now, half a hundred years later, as preparations advance for the 250th anniversary, the monumental vision appears to have shifted markedly toward historical re-enactment. Intent on stamping a unmistakably ornate signature on the capital, designs for a triumphal arch to be placed near the Lincoln Memorial have been shared. Three conceptual versions of this monument, now termed the “Independence Arch,” showcase varying degrees of gold leaf and ornamental figures.

Given the documented fondness for bling, many anticipate the most gilded design to be favored. Architectural observers have characterized the aesthetic as reminiscent of “provincial car dealership rococo.” All designs are modeled on the ancient Arch of Titus in Rome, a historical form repeated throughout history in structures like the Arc de Triomphe.

Size and Symbolism: A Foot for Every Year

Initial proposals floated three different sizes, but the largest option—towering at 250 feet tall—has reportedly been chosen. This “foot-per-year” concept is seen as chiming exactly with the anniversary's themes. For context, this would significantly surpass the 164-foot height of Paris's Arc de Triomphe.

Historically, monumental arches—especially grandiose ones—have been a magnet for autocratic leaders. Past visions for even more gargantuan arches in other capitals highlight this pattern of using architecture to assert power and permanence.

Beyond the Arch: Coins and Cage Fights

The architectural proposals are accompanied by other unconventional ideas for the anniversary. These reportedly include:

• Commemorative Coins: Producing $1 coins bearing a living person's portrait, a move that would contravene a longstanding law prohibiting such a practice.
• White House UFC Event: Staging a major ultimate fighting competition in a pop-up arena on the White House's grounds, a scenario unthinkable for prior administrations.

These proposals have contributed to a narrative of an administration willing to blur the lines between state ceremony and personal spectacle.

Cultural Pushback: The Fate of the Kennedy Center

Another contentious proposal involves the proposed redevelopment of the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, a revered example of modern architecture. This has sparked strong opposition from preservation groups.

One such organization has publicly condemned the approach, arguing that the building is a “cherished cultural institution” and a “celebrated work of modern architecture.” They have voiced deep concern over an “absence of adherence to established procedures” and emphasized that such public sites “must be managed transparently, not treated as personal property.”

Echoes of Rome

Through these endeavors, there is a clear attempt to appropriate classical imagery for contemporary political ends. Mandates favoring “traditional” architectural styles for federal buildings are viewed by observers as a calculated move to exert influence over civic design and sideline progressive expressions.

While the envisioned arch is marketed as a monument to national independence, its imposing scale and linked symbolism invite classical parallels. It recalls the ancient practice of a servant whispering “Memento mori” to a triumphant general—a admonition of transience and the impermanent nature of all things.